Skip to content
Applied AI

We integrate agentic systems into mission systems, under accreditation, under cost, on contract.

Autonomous CyberSpectrum / SignalDecision SupportAI for SE
Our agentic stack

Foundation to mission, on accredited infrastructure.

Layer 01

Mission

CyberSpectrum / SignalC2Systems Engineering
Layer 02

Evaluation

CMMI Level 3 eval disciplineRed-team harnessesAdversarial robustness
Layer 03

Tools

RF analyzersATO/RMF systemsGIS / ServiceNow
Layer 04

Orchestration

LangGraphMCPClaude Agent SDK
Layer 05

Models

Open-weight reasoning (Llama, Granite)Closed-API under accreditation
Layer 06

Foundation

GovCloudIL4 / IL5 enclaves
The Thesis

Generative AI made models talk.
Agentic AI makes them act.

The hard problems are multi-agent problems: coordinating sensors, drafting decisions, handing context to humans at the right moment. We engineer them.

How agents work

One mission goal. Several agents, sequenced.

A single “agent” rarely does the whole job. We compose narrow agents (one to plan, one to retrieve context, one to call tools, one to verify the output) and orchestrate them under a human-supervised checkpoint.

Anatomy of a multi-agent system
INPUTMission goalAGENT · 01PlannerAGENT · 02RetrievalPull contextAGENT · 03ToolCall functionsAGENT · 04CriticVerify outputAGENT · 05ExecutorCHECKPOINTHuman approvalREVISE
AgentHuman checkpointData flowRevision loop
Loop posture

Two ways to keep humans in control.

Every agentic system we ship documents its loop posture: how the human stays in control. The choice is made per system, not per company.

Human-on-the-loop

AI acts. Human supervises.

The AI runs continuously and takes actions on its own. A human can intervene at any point but doesn't need to approve every step. Used when speed matters and individual actions are reversible.

Human-in-the-loop

AI proposes. Human approves.

The AI generates a proposed action but cannot execute it. A human reviews and explicitly approves each one before the system acts. Used when stakes are high and actions are hard to reverse.

The solution map

Four pillars converge on one accredited core.

Each pillar is a family of narrow agents. They feed a shared multi-agent core that plans, acts, and verifies (all inside the accreditation boundary), then delivers into the mission systems you already run.

Four pillars, one accredited mission core
PILLAR · 01Autonomous CyberON-THE-LOOPPILLAR · 02Spectrum & SignalON / IN-LOOPPILLAR · 03C2 Decision SupportIN-THE-LOOPPILLAR · 04AI for Systems EngON-THE-LOOPAGENTIC COREMulti-agent orchestrationACCREDITATION GATERMF · ATO · IL5DELIVERS INTOMission systems
Solution pillarAgentic coreAccreditation gateConvergence / data flow
Four pillars

Where we apply agentic systems.

Pillar 01

Human-on-the-loop

Autonomous Cyber Defense

Multi-agent SOC augmentation. Continuous-monitoring agents triage events; investigation agents enrich with threat intel; response agents propose containment under human approval. Designed for accredited enclaves.

Use cases

  • Autonomous threat hunt on RMF-accredited networks
  • Agentic ATO artifact maintenance
  • Predictive remediation queues
Read pillar

Pillar 02

Human-on-the-loop / Human-in-the-loop

Agentic Spectrum & Signal Intelligence

Multi-agent orchestration across EW, SIGINT triage, and SATCOM link management. A sensing agent classifies; a deconfliction agent resolves frequency contention; a reporting agent generates the operator brief.

Use cases

  • ML-assisted SATCOM link reconfiguration under contested RF
  • Agent-driven SIGINT pre-triage
  • Spectrum deconfliction across coalition assets
Read pillar

Pillar 03

Human-in-the-loop

Autonomous C2 Decision Support

Agentic systems that compress C2 workflows (COA generation, mission planning, post-mission analysis) while keeping the human commander in the decision seat.

Use cases

  • Agentic COA brainstorming for tactical planners
  • Multi-agent wargaming on TTPs
  • Post-mission narrative generation from sensor logs
Read pillar

Pillar 04

Human-on-the-loop

AI for Systems Engineering

Agentic systems that automate the tedious half of systems engineering: requirements decomposition, MOSA conformance checks, ATO artifact generation, test-case synthesis. The work our engineers already do, accelerated.

Use cases

  • Agent-driven RMF artifact generation
  • Requirements-to-test-case synthesis
  • MOSA conformance checking on contract deliverables
Read pillar
AI Services · New for 2026

Ten new AI services, each built on something Nexagen already does.

We're expanding the firm's offering with concrete, buyable AI services. Five foundation services extend the OrionHub / Orion AI Forge platform; five mission services extend our C5ISR, cyber, and systems engineering practices.

AI Engineering Foundations

Extending OrionHub · Orion AI Forge · Cloud-DevSecOps

Extends

Foundations · 01

ML Model Engineering

Training, fine-tuning, and evaluation of reasoning + classical ML models in accredited environments. Built on Orion AI Forge.

Builds on · Orion AI Forge

Extends

Foundations · 02

MLOps / Model Lifecycle

Model versioning, deployment, drift detection, and rollback under CMMI Level 3 configuration management. The DevSecOps discipline applied to models.

Builds on · Cloud-DevSecOps · Orion Code Arsenal

New

Foundations · 03

Synthetic Data Engineering

Generation of cleared synthetic datasets when real data is sensitive, sparse, or non-releasable. Auditable provenance end-to-end.

Builds on · Cloud Computing · Cybersecurity

New

Foundations · 04

AI Evaluation & Governance

Eval harnesses, change-control for prompts and tools, and documented loop-posture per system. CMMI Level 3 applied to AI.

Builds on · CMMI Level 3 process

New

Foundations · 05

AI Red Team & Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial prompting, jailbreak testing, prompt-injection defense, and model risk assessments before acceptance review.

Builds on · Cybersecurity · HACS (GSA MAS)

Mission AI Applications

Extending C5ISR · Cyber · Systems Engineering · Avionics

New

Mission · 06

Edge / Tactical AI

On-device inference for tactical edge: degraded-network tolerant, hardware-constrained, with ATO-friendly deployment patterns.

Builds on · C5ISR · RF Engineering · EW

New

Mission · 07

Computer Vision for ISR

Object detection, change detection, and target classification across FMV and sensor feeds. Pipelines tuned for ISR cadence.

Builds on · C5ISR · Intelligence / Surveillance

New

Mission · 08

Predictive Maintenance / CBM+

Anomaly detection and remaining-useful-life models for tactical platforms. Integrated with sustainment workflows.

Builds on · Avionics · Logistics SCM

New

Mission · 09

RAG over DoW Knowledge

Retrieval-augmented generation across DoW doctrine, SOPs, ATO packages, and contract artifacts, with citations and access controls.

Builds on · ITSM · Systems Engineering

New

Mission · 10

Agentic ATO / RMF Automation

Agents that author RMF artifacts, monitor ATO drift, and keep packages audit-ready between renewals. Human-in-the-loop at decision gates.

Builds on · RMF · FedRAMP · COMSEC

Responsible by design

Evaluation is the unfair advantage.

01 / 03

CMMI Level 3 applied to AI evals

Process maturity is the moat. Our evaluation, change-control, and configuration management cover model behavior the same way they cover code.

02 / 03

Loop posture, named per system

Every deployment ships with a documented human-on-the-loop or human-in-the-loop posture. No ambiguity at acceptance review.

03 / 03

Red-team baked into delivery

Adversarial robustness and red-team harnesses are written into the SDP. Eval reports ship with the system.

Talk to our Applied AI team.

For teaming, capture meetings, or technical deep-dives on a specific mission set.